SURVEY OF OLDER PEOPLE ON END-OF-LIFE PERCEPTIONS AND PREFERENCES
The Public consultation with older consumers commenced in 2015 with a survey of members of the public aged 60 years and over, to understand their perceptions of end-of-life, care preferences, preferred place of death and attitides towards doctors predicting risk of death.
The goal was to identify current perceptions and potential points for interventions.
a) To characterise public perception of the use of the screening to predict risk of death based on clinical history and concerns and preferences about end-of-life care
b) To gauge respondent’s reactions to potential news on short life expectancy and their wish to be involved in or removed from decision making
c) To identify socio-demographic predictors of variation in perception and action on end-of-life issues
d) To establish public uptake of advance care directives among the target group and stimulate debate about the appropriateness of family making end-of-life decisions on a patient’s behalf
The survey was completed in August 2015 including people in their own home, and residents of aged care facilitites. Analysis completed in 2016.
===>Manuscript is currently (February 2017) being produced for a peer-reviewed journal
CONSUMER ADVISORY GROUP
In late 2015 we established a Consumer Advisory Group to undertake more detailed consultations and focus groups with members of the public.
Over two dozen people from all walks of life have joined and we would like to enrol more so we can have wider representation of the community.
INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CONSUMER ADVISORY GROUP
ON IMPROVING END OF LIFE
What is the Group composition?
We are inviting to our pool of consumer representative people who are, or give care to, older patients suffering from at least one chronic and life-limiting disease: advanced cancer or terminal lung or liver disease; stroke; chronic kidney disease; neurological degenerative disorders; dementia; etc.
Representatives can be patients, relatives, caregivers or aged care workers (community and nursing homes).
What do we do?
Our group of academic researchers will benefit from consumer views on emotional, physical and financial perspectives derived from their experience after contact with the health system (or that of their relative/patient). The projects have been funded by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.
What Projects are researchers conducting?
Several qualitative projects about the end of life care received by older Australians will commence in 2016, mainly looking at patients’ perspectives on inappropriate care, unnecessary procedures, decision-making on when to cease active management, and timing of referral to palliative or comfort care.
Our collaborators have also trained our consumers at promoting end-of-life conversation in August every year, on Dying To Know Day.
What experience is required?
-First-hand experience of contact with the hospital system for own care or care of a terminal patient/relative aged 60 years or older
-Living with or working for an advance chronically ill older person (aged 60 years and above) or experience participating in their end-of-life care in a caregiver’s capacity (not health professionals)
-Previous experience in deciding whether to initiate or discontinue aggressive treatments for elderly acquaintance or relative
-Willingness and ability to express opinions, tolerate diverse views, and participate in fair and open discussions without judgment or antagonism
What is the meeting frequency?
Every 2nd or 3rd month. Different representatives will be invited according to need. Representatives can attend via teleconference or in person. The duration of each meeting is one-and-a-half hours.
PATIENTS/FAMILY PERCEIVED INAPPROPRIATENESS OF ICU ADMISSION
We conducted a Scoping review of English language articles published between 2000 and 2016 in Medline or PsycInfo.
Objective: To describe patient or family perspective of inappropriate intensive care unit (ICU) admissions or treatments.
Out of intitial 391 publications, thirteen articles were eligible for review covering 6,194 elderly patients or surrogate decision-makers views.
===> Manuscript submitted for publication in the Australian Critical Care & Resuscitation Jnl
PATIENT/FAMILY DECISION-MAKING AT THE END OF LIFE
A review of the literature has been completed of articles published between 1995 and 2015 to describe the range of decision support tools for end-of-life and examine their effectiveness.The quality criteria framework endorsed by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) was used to assess suitability.
Out of 1,419 initial publications found, 17 met the eligibility criteria for review. Many tools did not provide prognostic information or cover patient values, and half were designed for self-administration, which we consider inappropriate. Genuine informed decision making cannot take place in view of these gaps.
===> Manuscript published in the Patient Education and Counseling journal. http://www.pec-journal.com/article/S0738-3991(16)30457-8/abstract