Scheduled Maintenance Notice

Please note that Researcher Profiles will be undergoing scheduled maintenance on Wednesday 7th Oct, from 8:00am to 9:00am. During this time, the Researcher Profiles system will be unavailable. We apologise for any inconvenience and appreciate your understanding.

Select Publications

Journal articles

Edmond G, 2008, 'Judging the Scientific and Medical Literature: Some Legal Implications of Changes to Biomedical Research and Publication', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 28, pp. 523 - 561

Edmond G, 2008, 'Secrets of the ¿Hot Tub¿: Expert Witnesses, Concurrent Evidence and Judge-led Law Reform in Australia', Civil Justice Quarterly, 27, pp. 51 - 82

Edmond G, 2008, 'Specialised Knowledge, the Exclusionary Discretions and Reliability: Reassessing Incriminating Expert Opinion Evidence', University of New South Wales Law Journal, 31, pp. 1 - 55

Edmond G, 2007, 'Supersizing Daubert Science for Litigation and its implications for Legal Practice and Scientific Research', Villanova Law Review, 52, pp. 857 - 924

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2006, 'Anti-social epistemologies', Social Studies of Science, 36, pp. 843 - 853

Edmond G, 2006, 'Disorder with Law: Determining the Geographical Indication for the Coonawarra Wine Region.', Adelaide Law Review, 27, pp. 59 - 183

Betts S; Goodman-Delahunty J; Edmond G, 2006, 'Mock jurors` responses to expert medical testimony in a homicide trial', Australian Journal of Psychology, 58, pp. 19 - 19

Edmond G, 2005, 'Judging Surveys: Experts, Empirical Evidence and Law Reform', Federal Law Review, 33, pp. 95 - 139

Edmond G, 2005, 'Judging Surveys: Experts, Empirical Evidence and Law Reform', Federal Law Review, 33, pp. 95 - 139, http://dx.doi.org/10.22145/flr.33.1.4

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2004, 'Daubert and the exclusionary ethos: The convergence of corporate and judicial attitudes towards the admissibility of expert evidence in tort litigation', Law and Policy, 26, pp. 231 - 257

Edmond G, 2004, 'Law and the uncooked - a reply', Oceania, 75, pp. 60 - 67

Edmond G, 2004, 'Thick decisions: Expertise, Advocacy and reasonableness in the Federal Court of Australia', Oceania, 74, pp. 190 - 230

Edmond G, 2003, 'After Objectivity: Expert Evidence and Procedural Reform', Sydney Law Review, 25, pp. 131 - 163

Edmond G, 2002, 'Legal engineering: Contested representations of law, science (and non-science) and society', Social Studies of Science, 32, pp. 371 - 412, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032003002

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2002, 'Conjectures and Exhumations: Citations of history, philosophy and sociology of science in US federal courts', Law and Literature, 14, pp. 309 - 366

Edmond G, 2002, 'Constructing miscarriages of justice: Misunderstanding the role of scientific evidence in high profile criminal appeals', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22, pp. 53 - 89

Edmond G, 2002, 'Legal Engineering', Social Studies of Science, 32, pp. 371 - 412

Edmond G, 2002, 'Whigs in Court: Historiographical Problems with Expert Evidence', Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 14, pp. 123 - 175

Edmond G, 2001, 'The Law-Set: The Legal-Scientific Production of Medical Propriety', Science, Technology & Human Values, 26, pp. 191 - 226, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600204

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2000, 'Litigation life: Law-science knowledge construction in (Bendectin) mass toxic tort litigation', Social Studies of Science, 30, pp. 265 - 316, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631200030002003

Edmond G, 2000, 'Judicial Representations of Scientific Evidence', Modern Law Review, 63, pp. 216 - 251, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00260

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1999, 'Juggling science: From polemic to pastiche', Social Epistemology, 13, pp. 215 - 233, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026917299298727

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1999, 'Creating (public) science in the Noah's Ark case', Public Understanding of Science, 8, pp. 317 - 343, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/8/4/304

Edmond G, 1998, 'The Next Step or Moonwalking? Expert Evidence, the Public Understanding of Science and the Case against Imwinkelried's Didactic Trial Procedures', The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2, pp. 13 - 31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/136571279800200102

Edmond G, 1998, 'Down by Science: Context and commitment in the lay response to incriminating scientific evidence during a murder trial', Public Understanding of Science, 7, pp. 83 - 111, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096366259800700201

EDMOND G; MERCER D, 1998, 'Representing the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Law', Science Communication, 19, pp. 307 - 327, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547098019004003

Edmond G, 1997, '`Beyond Good and Evil: Ideal Images of Science in the Law`', Judicial Officers' Bulletin, pp. 59 - 60

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1997, '`Keeping `Junk` History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science out of the Courtroom`', University of New South Wales Law Journal, 20, pp. 48 - 100

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1997, '`Recognising Daubert: What Judges should know about Falsificationism`', Expert Evidence, pp. 28 - 40

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1997, '`Scientific Literacy and the Jury`', Public Understanding of Science, pp. 329 - 359

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1997, '`The Secret Life of (Mass) Torts`', University of New South Wales Law Journal, 20, pp. 666 - 706

Edmond G, 1997, 'Beyond Good and Evil: Idea. Images of Science in the Law', Judicial Officers' Bulletin, pp. 19 - 60

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1997, 'Keeping `Junk` History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science Out of the Courtroom: Problems with The Reception of Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc', University of New South Wales Law Journal, 20, pp. 48 - 100

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1997, 'Recognising Daubert: What Judges Should Know About Falsification', Expert Evidence, pp. 29 - 42

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1997, 'Scientific Literacy and the Jury: Reconsidering Jury `Competence`', Public Understanding of Science, pp. 329 - 357

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1997, 'The Secret Life of (Mass) Torts: The `Bendectin Litigation` and the Construction of Law-Science Knowledges', University of New South Wales Law Journal, 20, pp. 666 - 706

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1996, 'Survey review', Metascience, 5, pp. 40 - 58, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02988887


Back to profile page