By Professor Gary Edmond

Journal articles

Edmond G, 2014, 'Blind justice? Forensic science and the use of closed circuit television images as identification evidence in South Africa', The South African Law Journal, 131, pp. 109 - 148, http://reference.sabinet.co.za/document/EJC148443

Edmond G; san roque ; Hamer D; Ligertwood A, 2014, 'Christie, section 137 and forensic science evidence (after Dupas v The Queen and R v XY)', Monash University Law Review, 40, pp. 389 - 412

Edmond G; Vuille J, 2014, 'Comparing the Use of Forensic Science Evidence in Australia, Switzerland, and the United States: Transcending the Adversarial-Non adversarial Dichotomy', Jurimetrics: journal of law, science and technology, 54, pp. 221 - 276

Edmond G; Cunliffe E, 2014, 'Gaitkeeping in Canada: Mis-steps in assessing the reliability of expert testimony', Canadian Bar Review, 92, pp. 327 - 368

Edmond G; San Roque M, 2014, 'Honeysett v The Queen: Forensic Science, ‘Specialised Knowledge’ and the Uniform Evidence Law', The Sydney Law Review, 36, pp. 323 - 344, http://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/slr_36/slr36_2/SLRv36n2EdmondSanRoque.pdf

Edmond G; Martire KA; Kemp RI; Hamer D; Hibbert B; Ligertwood A; Porter G; San Roque M; Searston R; Tangen J; Thompson M; White D, 2014, 'How to cross-examine forensic scientists: A guide for lawyers', Australian Bar Review, 39, pp. 174 - 197, http://mbthompson.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Edmond-HowToCross-ExamineForensicScientists.pdf

Edmond G, 2014, 'The 'Science' of Miscarriages of Justice', University of New South Wales Law Journal, 37, pp. 376 - 406, http://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/edmond_371.pdf

Edmond G, 2014, 'The admissibility of forensic science and medicine evidence under the Uniform Evidence Law', Criminal Law Journal, 38, pp. 136 - 158, http://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/blob?blobguid=I3d66252eeb8c11e3bb9be84c9211d279&file=38_Crim_LJ_136.pdf

Edmond G, 2013, 'Expert evidence in reports and courts', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 45, pp. 248 - 262, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2013.793392

Edmond G; Thompson MB; Tangen JM, 2013, 'A guide to interpreting forensic testimony: Scientific approaches to fingerprint evidence', Law, Probability and Risk, 13, pp. 1 - 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgt011

Edmond G, 2013, 'Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, pp. 80 - 91, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.09.004

Edmond G, 2013, '(Ad)Ministering Justice: Expert Evidence and the Professional Responsibilities of Prosecutors', University of New South Wales Law Journal, 36, pp. 921 - 953

Edmond G; San Roque M; Cole S; Kemp R; Martire KA; Porter G; Tangen J, 2013, 'Justicia's Gaze: Surveillance, evidence and the criminal trial', Surveillance and Society, 11, pp. 252 - 271

Edmond G, 2013, 'Trial by Theory: A Response to Acharya's. Law's Treatment of Science: From Idealization to Understandin', Dalhousie Law Journal, 36, pp. 57 - 91, http://law.dal.ca/Research%20and%20Journals/Journals/Dalhousie_Law_Journal/index.php

Ligertwood A; Edmond G, 2012, 'Discussion paper: A just measure of probability', Law Probability and Risk, 11, pp. 365 - 369, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgs023

Edmond G, 2012, 'Advice for the courts: A multidisciplinary advisory panel?', International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 16, pp. 263 - 297

Ligertwood A; Edmond G, 2012, 'Expressing evaluative forensic science opinions in a court of law', Law, Probability and Risk, 11, pp. 289 - 302, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgs016

Edmond G, 2012, 'Is reliability sufficient? The Law Commission and expert evidence in international and interdisciplinary perspective (Part1)', International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 16, pp. 30 - 65, http://dx.doi.org/10.1350/ijep.2012.16.1.391

Edmond G; Found B, 2012, 'Reporting on the comparison and interpretation of pattern evidence: recommendations for forensic specialists', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44, pp. 1 - 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2011.644260

Edmond G; Roach K, 2011, 'A Contextual Approach to the Admissibility of the State's Forensic Science and Medical Evidence', University of Toronto Law Journal, 61, pp. 343 - 409, http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tlj.2011.0025

Edmond G; Martire KA; San Roque M, 2011, ''Mere guesswork': Cross-lingual voice comparisons and the jury', Sydney Law Review, 33, pp. 395 - 425, http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=532339284270660;res=IELHSS

Roach ; Edmond G, 2011, 'A Contextual Approach to the Admissibility of the State’s Forensic Science and Medical Evidence', University of Toronto Law Journal, 61, pp. 343 - 409, http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/university_of_toronto_law_journal/v061/61.3.edmond.html

Edmond G, 2011, 'Actual innocents? Legal limitations and their implications for forensic science and medicine', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43, pp. 177 - 212, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2011.555419

Edmond G; Roberts A, 2011, 'Procedural fairness, the criminal trial and forensic science and medicine', Sydney Law Review, 33, pp. 359 - 394, http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=532320651299402;res=IELHSS

Edmond G, 2011, 'The admissibility of incriminating expert opinion evidence in the US, England and Canada', Judicial Officers' Bulletin, 23, pp. 67 - 70, http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/sites/law.unsw.edu.au/files/pre/f/docs/pubs/unsw_edmond_job.pdf

Edmond G, 2011, 'The building blocks of forensic science and law: Recent work on DNA profiling (and photo comparison)', Social Studies of Science, 41, pp. 127 - 152, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312710379453

Edmond G; Roberts AW, 2011, 'The Law Commission’s Report on Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings', Criminal Law Review, 11, pp. 844 - 862, http://international.westlaw.com/result/default.wl?mt=314&origin=Search&query=%22GARY+EDMOND%22+%26+da(aft+31%2f12%2f2010)&db=CRIMLR&rlt=CLID_QRYRLT969629432222&method=TNC&service=Search&eq=search&rp=%2fsearch%2fdefault.wl&sp=UNSWales-2003&srch=TRUE&vr=2.0&action=Search&rltdb=CLID_DB1283036412222&sv=Split&fmqv=s&fn=_top&rs=WLIN7.02

Edmond G; San Roque M; Kristy M, 2011, 'Unsound law: Issues with ("expert") voice comparison evidence', Melbourne University Law Review, 35, pp. 52 - 112, http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?sgHitCountType=None&sort=DA-SORT&inPS=true&prodId=LT&userGroupName=unsw&tabID=T002&searchId=R1&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&contentSegment=&searchType=AdvancedSearchForm&currentPosition=2&contentSet=GALE%7CA276808495&&docId=GALE%7CA276808495&docType=GALE&role=

Edmond G, 2010, 'Impartiality, efficiency or reliability? A critical response to expert evidence law and procedure in Australia', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, pp. 83 - 99, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450610903258128

Edmond G; Kemp RI; Hamer D; Burton M; Biber ; San Roque M, 2010, 'Atkins v The Emperor: The “Cautious” use of Unreliable “Expert” Opinion', International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 14, pp. 146 - 165, http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/staff/EdmondG/docs/atkins_vs_emperor.pdf

Edmond G, 2010, 'Impartiality, efficiency or reliability? A critical response to expert evidence law and procedure in Australia', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, pp. 1 - 17, http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/staff/EdmondG/docs/ajfs_impartiality.pdf

Edmond G, 2010, 'Suspect sciences? Evidentiary Problems with Emerging Technologies', International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics, 2, pp. 40 - 72, http://www.igi-global.com/gateway/contentowned/article.aspx?TitleId=41716International%20Journal%20of%20Digital%20Crime%20and%20Forensics

Edmond G; Biber ; Porter G; Kemp RI, 2009, 'Law's looking glass: expert identification evidence derived from photographic and video images', Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 20, pp. 337 - 377

Edmond G, 2009, 'Merton and the hot tub: Scientific conventions and expert evidence in Australian civil procedure', Law and Contemporary Problems, 72, pp. 159 - 189

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2009, 'Norms and Irony in the Biosciences: ameliorating critique in synthetic biology', Law and Literature, 21, pp. 445 - 493

Edmond G; San Roque M, 2009, 'Quasi-justice: Ad hoc expertise and identification evidence', Criminal Law Journal, 33, pp. 8 - 33

Edmond G, 2008, 'Expert Evidence', Oxford Companion to Law, pp. 436 - 437

Edmond G, 2008, 'Judging the Scientific and Medical Literature: Some Legal Implications of Changes to Biomedical Research and Publication', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 28, pp. 523 - 561

Edmond G, 2008, 'Secrets of the ¿Hot Tub¿: Expert Witnesses, Concurrent Evidence and Judge-led Law Reform in Australia', Civil Justice Quarterly, 27, pp. 51 - 82

Edmond G, 2008, 'Specialised Knowledge, the Exclusionary Discretions and Reliability: Reassessing Incriminating Expert Opinion Evidence', University of New South Wales Law Journal, 31, pp. 1 - 55

Edmond G, 2007, 'Supersizing Daubert Science for Litigation and its implications for Legal Practice and Scientific Research', Villanova Law Review, 52, pp. 857 - 924

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2006, 'Anti-social epistemologies', Social Studies of Science, 36, pp. 843 - 853

Edmond G, 2006, 'Disorder with Law: Determining the Geographical Indication for the Coonawarra Wine Region.', Adelaide Law Review, 27, pp. 59 - 183

Betts S; Goodman-Delahunty J; Edmond G, 2006, 'Mock jurors` responses to expert medical testimony in a homicide trial', Australian Journal of Psychology, 58, pp. 19 - 19

Edmond G, 2005, 'Judging Surveys: Experts, Empirical Evidence and Law Reform', Federal Law Review, 33, pp. 95 - 139

Edmond G, 2005, 'Judging Surveys: Experts, Empirical Evidence and Law Reform', Federal Law Review, 33, pp. 95 - 139, http://dx.doi.org/10.22145/flr.33.1.4

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2004, 'Daubert and the exclusionary ethos: The convergence of corporate and judicial attitudes towards the admissibility of expert evidence in tort litigation', Law and Policy, 26, pp. 231 - 257

Edmond G, 2004, 'Law and the uncooked - a reply', Oceania, 75, pp. 60 - 67

Edmond G, 2004, 'Thick decisions: Expertise, Advocacy and reasonableness in the Federal Court of Australia', Oceania, 74, pp. 190 - 230

Edmond G, 2003, 'After Objectivity: Expert Evidence and Procedural Reform', Sydney Law Review, 25, pp. 131 - 163

Back to profile page