By Professor Gary Edmond

Journal articles

Ligertwood A; Edmond G, 2012, 'Discussion paper: A just measure of probability', Law, Probability and Risk, 11, pp. 365 - 369, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgs023

Edmond G, 2012, 'Advice for the courts: A multidisciplinary advisory panel?', International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 16, pp. 263 - 297

Ligertwood A; Edmond G, 2012, 'Expressing evaluative forensic science opinions in a court of law', Law, Probability and Risk, 11, pp. 289 - 302, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgs016

Edmond G, 2012, 'Is reliability sufficient? The Law Commission and expert evidence in international and interdisciplinary perspective (Part1)', International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 16, pp. 30 - 65, http://dx.doi.org/10.1350/ijep.2012.16.1.391

Edmond G; Found B, 2012, 'Reporting on the comparison and interpretation of pattern evidence: recommendations for forensic specialists', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44, pp. 1 - 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2011.644260

Edmond G; Martire KA; San Roque M, 2011, ''Mere guesswork': Cross-lingual voice comparisons and the jury', Sydney Law Review, 33, pp. 395 - 425, http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=532339284270660;res=IELHSS

Edmond G; Roach K, 2011, 'A Contextual Approach to the Admissibility of the State's Forensic Science and Medical Evidence', University of Toronto Law Journal, 61, pp. 343 - 409, http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tlj.2011.0025

Roach ; Edmond G, 2011, 'A Contextual Approach to the Admissibility of the State’s Forensic Science and Medical Evidence', University of Toronto Law Journal, 61, pp. 343 - 409, http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/university_of_toronto_law_journal/v061/61.3.edmond.html

Edmond G, 2011, 'Actual innocents? Legal limitations and their implications for forensic science and medicine', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43, pp. 177 - 212, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2011.555419

Edmond G; Roberts A, 2011, 'Procedural fairness, the criminal trial and forensic science and medicine', Sydney Law Review, 33, pp. 359 - 394, http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=532320651299402;res=IELHSS

Edmond G, 2011, 'The admissibility of incriminating expert opinion evidence in the US, England and Canada', Judicial Officers' Bulletin, 23, pp. 67 - 70, http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/sites/law.unsw.edu.au/files/pre/f/docs/pubs/unsw_edmond_job.pdf

Edmond G, 2011, 'The building blocks of forensic science and law: Recent work on DNA profiling (and photo comparison)', Social Studies of Science, 41, pp. 127 - 152, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312710379453

Edmond G; Roberts AW, 2011, 'The Law Commission’s Report on Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings', Criminal Law Review, 11, pp. 844 - 862, http://international.westlaw.com/result/default.wl?mt=314&origin=Search&query=%22GARY+EDMOND%22+%26+da(aft+31%2f12%2f2010)&db=CRIMLR&rlt=CLID_QRYRLT969629432222&method=TNC&service=Search&eq=search&rp=%2fsearch%2fdefault.wl&sp=UNSWales-2003&srch=TRUE&vr=2.0&action=Search&rltdb=CLID_DB1283036412222&sv=Split&fmqv=s&fn=_top&rs=WLIN7.02

Edmond G; San Roque M; Kristy M, 2011, 'Unsound law: Issues with ("expert") voice comparison evidence', Melbourne University Law Review, 35, pp. 52 - 112, http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?sgHitCountType=None&sort=DA-SORT&inPS=true&prodId=LT&userGroupName=unsw&tabID=T002&searchId=R1&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&contentSegment=&searchType=AdvancedSearchForm&currentPosition=2&contentSet=GALE%7CA276808495&&docId=GALE%7CA276808495&docType=GALE&role=

Edmond G, 2010, 'Impartiality, efficiency or reliability? A critical response to expert evidence law and procedure in Australia', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, pp. 83 - 99, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450610903258128

Edmond G; Kemp RI; Hamer D; Burton M; Biber ; San Roque M, 2010, 'Atkins v The Emperor: The “Cautious” use of Unreliable “Expert” Opinion', International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 14, pp. 146 - 165, http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/staff/EdmondG/docs/atkins_vs_emperor.pdf

Edmond G, 2010, 'Impartiality, efficiency or reliability? A critical response to expert evidence law and procedure in Australia', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, pp. 1 - 17, http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/staff/EdmondG/docs/ajfs_impartiality.pdf

Edmond G, 2010, 'Suspect sciences? Evidentiary Problems with Emerging Technologies', International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics, 2, pp. 40 - 72, http://www.igi-global.com/gateway/contentowned/article.aspx?TitleId=41716International%20Journal%20of%20Digital%20Crime%20and%20Forensics

Edmond G; Biber ; Porter G; Kemp RI, 2009, 'Law's looking glass: expert identification evidence derived from photographic and video images', Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 20, pp. 337 - 377

Edmond G, 2009, 'Merton and the hot tub: Scientific conventions and expert evidence in Australian civil procedure', Law and Contemporary Problems, 72, pp. 159 - 189

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2009, 'Norms and Irony in the Biosciences: ameliorating critique in synthetic biology', Law and Literature, 21, pp. 445 - 493

Edmond G; San Roque M, 2009, 'Quasi-justice: Ad hoc expertise and identification evidence', Criminal Law Journal, 33, pp. 8 - 33

Edmond G, 2008, 'Expert Evidence', Oxford Companion to Law, pp. 436 - 437

Edmond G, 2008, 'Judging the Scientific and Medical Literature: Some Legal Implications of Changes to Biomedical Research and Publication', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 28, pp. 523 - 561, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqn021

Edmond G, 2008, 'Secrets of the ¿Hot Tub¿: Expert Witnesses, Concurrent Evidence and Judge-led Law Reform in Australia', Civil Justice Quarterly, 27, pp. 51 - 82

Edmond G, 2008, 'Specialised Knowledge, the Exclusionary Discretions and Reliability: Reassessing Incriminating Expert Opinion Evidence', University of New South Wales Law Journal, 31, pp. 1 - 55

Edmond G, 2007, 'Supersizing Daubert Science for Litigation and its implications for Legal Practice and Scientific Research', Villanova Law Review, 52, pp. 857 - 924

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2006, 'Anti-social epistemologies', Social Studies of Science, 36, pp. 843 - 853

Edmond G, 2006, 'Disorder with Law: Determining the Geographical Indication for the Coonawarra Wine Region.', Adelaide Law Review, 27, pp. 59 - 183

Betts S; Goodman-Delahunty J; Edmond G, 2006, 'Mock jurors` responses to expert medical testimony in a homicide trial', Australian Journal of Psychology, 58, pp. 19 - 19, http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000242541400063&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=891bb5ab6ba270e68a

Edmond G, 2005, 'Judging Surveys: Experts, Empirical Evidence and Law Reform', Federal Law Review, 33, pp. 95 - 139

Edmond G, 2005, 'Judging Surveys: Experts, Empirical Evidence and Law Reform', Federal Law Review, 33, pp. 95 - 139, http://dx.doi.org/10.22145/flr.33.1.4

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2004, 'Daubert and the exclusionary ethos: The convergence of corporate and judicial attitudes towards the admissibility of expert evidence in tort litigation', Law and Policy, 26, pp. 231 - 257

Edmond G, 2004, 'Law and the uncooked - a reply', Oceania, 75, pp. 60 - 67

Edmond G, 2004, 'Thick decisions: Expertise, Advocacy and reasonableness in the Federal Court of Australia', Oceania, 74, pp. 190 - 230

Edmond G, 2003, 'After Objectivity: Expert Evidence and Procedural Reform', Sydney Law Review, 25, pp. 131 - 163

Edmond G, 2002, 'Legal engineering: Contested representations of law, science (and non-science) and society', Social Studies of Science, 32, pp. 371 - 412, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032003002

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2002, 'Conjectures and Exhumations: Citations of history, philosophy and sociology of science in US federal courts', Law and Literature, 14, pp. 309 - 366

Edmond G, 2002, 'Constructing miscarriages of justice: Misunderstanding the role of scientific evidence in high profile criminal appeals', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22, pp. 53 - 89

Edmond G, 2002, 'Legal Engineering', Social Studies of Science, 32, pp. 371 - 412

Edmond G, 2002, 'Whigs in Court: Historiographical Problems with Expert Evidence', Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 14, pp. 123 - 175

Edmond G, 2001, 'The Law-Set: The Legal-Scientific Production of Medical Propriety', Science, Technology & Human Values, 26, pp. 191 - 226, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600204

Edmond G; Mercer D, 2000, 'Litigation life: Law-science knowledge construction in (Bendectin) mass toxic tort litigation', Social Studies of Science, 30, pp. 265 - 316, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631200030002003

Edmond G, 2000, 'Judicial Representations of Scientific Evidence', Modern Law Review, 63, pp. 216 - 251, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00260

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1999, 'Juggling science: From polemic to pastiche', Social Epistemology, 13, pp. 215 - 233, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026917299298727

Edmond G; Mercer D, 1999, 'Creating (public) science in the Noah's Ark case', Public Understanding of Science, 8, pp. 317 - 343, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/8/4/304

Edmond G, 1998, 'The Next Step or Moonwalking? Expert Evidence, the Public Understanding of Science and the Case against Imwinkelried's Didactic Trial Procedures', The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2, pp. 13 - 31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/136571279800200102

Edmond G, 1998, 'Down by Science: Context and commitment in the lay response to incriminating scientific evidence during a murder trial', Public Understanding of Science, 7, pp. 83 - 111, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096366259800700201

EDMOND G; MERCER D, 1998, 'Representing the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Law', Science Communication, 19, pp. 307 - 327, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547098019004003

Edmond G, 1997, '`Beyond Good and Evil: Ideal Images of Science in the Law`', Judicial Officers' Bulletin, pp. 59 - 60

Back to profile page