ORCID as entered in ROS

Select Publications
2023, 'Speaker identification in courtroom contexts – Part II: Investigation of bias in individual listeners’ responses', Forensic Science International, 349, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111768
,2023, 'Correction to: The novel object-matching test (NOM Test): A psychometric measure of visual comparison ability (Behavior Research Methods, (2023), 10.3758/s13428-023-02069-6)', Behavior Research Methods, http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02154-w
,2023, 'The novel object-matching test (NOM Test): A psychometric measure of visual comparison ability', Behavior Research Methods, http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02069-6
,2023, 'Thinking false and slow: Implausible beliefs and the Cognitive Reflection Test', Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02321-2
,2022, 'Speaker identification in courtroom contexts – Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology', Forensic Science International, 341, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111499
,2022, 'Reliability and validity of a quality tool for assessing clinical forensic medicine legal reports', Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 89, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2022.102359
,2022, 'Finding the Perfect Match: Fingerprint Expertise Facilitates Statistical Learning and Visual Comparison Decision-Making', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 29, pp. 386 - 397, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000422
,2022, 'The Law Meets Psychological Expertise: Eight Best Practices to Improve Forensic Psychological Assessment', Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 18, pp. 169 - 192, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-050420-010148
,2021, 'Likeability and Expert Persuasion: Dislikeability Reduces the Perceived Persuasiveness of Expert Evidence', Frontiers in Psychology, 12, http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785677
,2021, 'Public attitudes towards the use of automatic facial recognition technology in criminal justice systems around the world', PLoS ONE, 16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258241
,2021, 'Corrigendum to “Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices” [Sci. Justice 60 (3) (2020) 216–224] (Science & Justice (2020) 60(3) (216–224), (S1355030619302102), (10.1016/j.scijus.2019.12.005))', Science and Justice, 61, pp. 449 - 450, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2021.04.001
,2021, 'Lay Comprehension of Statistical Evidence: A Novel Measurement Approach', Law and Human Behavior, 45, pp. 370 - 390, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000457
,2020, 'Limited not lazy: a quasi-experimental secondary analysis of evidence quality evaluations by those who hold implausible beliefs', Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00264-z
,2020, 'The multi-faceted nature of visual statistical learning: Individual differences in learning conditional and distributional regularities across time and space', Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27, pp. 1291 - 1299, http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01781-0
,2020, 'Exploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy framework', Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25, pp. 90 - 110, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12165
,2020, 'Forensic feature-comparison expertise: Statistical learning facilitates visual comparison performance', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 26, pp. 493 - 506, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000266
,2020, 'Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices', Science and Justice, 60, pp. 216 - 224, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2019.12.005
,2020, 'Human factors in forensic science: The cognitive mechanisms that underlie forensic feature-comparison expertise', Forensic Science International: Synergy, 2, pp. 148 - 153, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.05.001
,2020, 'Judging experts: Australian magistrates’ evaluations of expert opinion quality', Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27, pp. 950 - 962, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1751334
,2019, 'The effect of ambiguous question wording on jurors’ presumption of innocence', Psychology, Crime & Law, pp. 1 - 19, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2019.1669598
,2019, 'Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability', Forensic Science International, 302, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109877
,2019, 'What do the experts know? Calibration, precision, and the wisdom of crowds among forensic handwriting experts', PsyArXiv, http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pq7kz
,2019, 'Just cognition: Scientific research on bias and some implications for legal procedure and decision-making', Modern Law Review, 82, pp. 633 - 664, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12424
,2019, 'Factors associated with Quitline and pharmacotherapy utilisation among low-socioeconomic status smokers', Addictive Behaviors, 89, pp. 113 - 120, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.09.029
,2019, 'Forensic Science Evidence and the Limits of Cross-Examination', Melbourne University Law Review, 42, pp. 858 - 920, https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/3256077/05-Edmond-et-al.pdf
,2018, 'Clear communication through clear purpose: understanding statistical statements made by forensic scientists', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50, pp. 619 - 627, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2018.1439101
,2018, 'Are Forensic Scientists Experts?', Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, pp. 199 - 208, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.010
,2018, 'Considerations when designing human performance tests in the forensic sciences', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50, pp. 166 - 182, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2016.1229815
,2017, 'Smoking and Finances: Baseline Characteristics of Low Income Daily Smokers in the FISCALS Cohort', International Journal for Equity in Health, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0643-6
,2017, 'Antipodean forensics: a comment on ANZFSS's response to PCAST', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50, pp. 140 - 151, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2017.1340520
,2017, 'Expert reports and the forensic sciences', UNSW Law Journal, 40, pp. 590 - 637, http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000416757300006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=891bb5ab6ba270e68a
,2017, 'Consistent with: What doctors say and jurors hear.', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2017.1324583
,2017, 'Forensic science, reliability and scientific validity: Advice from America', Criminal Law Review -London-, 5, pp. 357 - 378
,2017, 'A comment on the PCAST report: Skip the “match”/“non-match” stage', Forensic Science International, 272, pp. e7 - e9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.10.018
,2017, 'Predictors of retention in a randomised trial of smoking cessation in low-socioeconomic status Australian smokers', Addictive Behaviors, 64, pp. 13 - 20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.019
,2017, 'On the likelihood of “encapsulating all uncertainty”', Science and Justice, 57, pp. 76 - 79, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2016.10.004
,2017, 'Rethinking expert opinion evidence', Melbourne University Law Review, 40, pp. 967 - 998
,2017, 'Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners', Science and Justice, 57, pp. 144 - 154, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2016.11.005
,2016, 'Forensic science in criminal courts: The latest scientific insights', Australian Bar Review, 42
,2016, 'Model forensic science', Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 48, pp. 496 - 537, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2015.1128969
,2016, 'Associations between behavioural risk factors and smoking, heavy smoking and future smoking among an Australian population-based sample', Preventive Medicine, 83, pp. 70 - 76, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.020
,2015, 'Generalized linear mixed models for deception research: avoiding problematic data aggregation', Psychology, Crime and Law, 21, pp. 821 - 835, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1054384
,2015, 'Perception problems of the verbal scale: A reanalysis and application of a membership function approach', Science & Justice, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2015.01.002
,2015, 'Smoking Cessation among Low-Socioeconomic Status and Disadvantaged Population Groups: A Systematic Review of Research Output', International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, pp. 6403 - 6422, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606403
,2014, 'The difference between rigor and specificity in examining methodologies for analyzing survey data: response to commentary', Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 16, pp. 1539 - 1540, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu189
,2014, 'Use of smoking cessation and quit support services by socioeconomic status over 10 years of the national drug strategy household survey', Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 16, pp. 1647 - 1655, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu119
,2014, 'A randomized clinical trial of a financial education intervention with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for low socio-economic status Australian smokers: a study protocol', Addiction (Abingdon, England), 109, pp. 1602 - 1611, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.12669
,2014, 'A randomized clinical trial of a financial education intervention with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for low socio-economic status Australian smokers: a study protocol', Addiction (Abingdon, England), 109, pp. 1602 - 1611, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.12669
,2014, 'Response to Recommendation 2 of the 2009 NAS Report—Standards for Formatting and Reporting Expert Evaluative Opinions: Where Do We Stand?', Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal, 5, pp. 1 - 14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19409044.2014.880973
,2014, 'On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the Weak evidence effect.', Forensic Science International, 240, pp. 61 - 68, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.04.005
,